Correction to: The role of passive immunization in the age of SARS-CoV-2: an update.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Measures of infection prevention and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 infection has manifested as a major threat to both patients and healthcare providers around the world. Radiation oncology institutions (ROI) deliver a major component of cancer treatment, with protocols that might span over several weeks, with the result of increasing susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and presenting with a more severe clinical course when compared with the general population. The aim of this manuscript is to investigate the impact of ROI protocols and performance on daily practice in the high-risk cancer patients during this pandemic. METHODS: We addressed the incidence of positive COVID-19 cases in both patients and health care workers (HCW), in addition to the protective measures adopted in ROIs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland using a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire showed that a noteworthy number of ROIs were able to complete treatment in SARS-CoV­2 positive cancer patients, with only a short interruption. The ROIs reported a significant decrease in patient volume that was not impacted by the circumambient disease incidence, the type of ROI or the occurrence of positive cases. Of the ROIs 16.5% also reported infected HCWs. About half of the ROIs (50.5%) adopted a screening program for patients whereas only 23.3% also screened their HCWs. The range of protective measures included the creation of working groups, instituting home office work and protection with face masks. Regarding the therapeutic options offered, curative procedures were performed with either unchanged or moderately decreased schedules, whereas palliative or benign radiotherapy procedures were more often shortened. Most ROIs postponed or cancelled radiation treatment for benign indications (88.1%). The occurrence of SARS-CoV­2 infections did not affect the treatment options for curative procedures. Non-university-based ROIs seemed to be more willing to change their treatment options for curative and palliative cases than university-based ROIs. CONCLUSION: Most ROIs reported a deep impact of SARS-CoV­2 infections on their work routine. Modification and prioritization of treatment regimens and the application of protective measures preserved a well-functioning radiation oncology service and patient care.

Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis.

BACKGROUND: The German government has made it mandatory to wear respiratory masks covering mouth and nose (MNC) as an effective strategy to fight SARS-CoV-2 infections. In many countries, this directive has been extended on shopping malls or public transportation. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the statutory regulation to wear protective masks during the COVID-19 crisis from a medical standpoint. METHODS: We performed an extensive query of the most recent publications addressing the prevention of viral infections including the use of face masks in the community as a method to prevent the spread of the infection. We addressed the issues of practicability, professional use, and acceptability based on the community and the environment where the user resided. RESULTS: Upon our critical review of the available literature, we found only weak evidence for wearing a face mask as an efficient hygienic tool to prevent the spread of a viral infection. However, the use of MNC seems to be linked to relevant protection during close contact scenarios by limiting pathogen-containing aerosol and liquid droplet dissemination. Importantly, we found evidence for significant respiratory compromise in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease, secondary to the development of hypercapnia. This could also happen in patients with lung infections, with or without SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Epidemiologists currently emphasize that wearing MNC will effectively interrupt airborne infections in the community. The government and the politicians have followed these recommendations and used them to both advise and, in some cases, mandate the general population to wear MNC in public locations. Overall, the results seem to suggest that there are some clinically relevant scenarios where the use of MNC necessitates more defined recommendations. Our critical evaluation of the literature both highlights the protective effects of certain types of face masks in defined risk groups, and emphasizes their potential risks.

No Difference in Overall Survival and Non-Breast Cancer Deaths after Partial Breast Radiotherapy Compared to Whole Breast Radiotherapy-A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery is the standard approach in early stage breast cancer. However, the extent of breast tissue that has to be targeted with radiation has not been determined yet. Traditionally, the whole breast was covered by two opposing tangential beams. Several randomized trials have tested partial breast irradiation (PBI) compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI) using different radiation techniques. There is evidence from randomized trials that PBI might result in lower mortality rates compared to WBI. We aimed to reassess this question using current data from randomized trials. MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing WBI and PBI in early stage breast cancer with publication dates after 2009. The meta-analysis was performed using the published event rates and the effect sizes for overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and non-breast cancer death (NBCD) as investigated endpoints. Analysis of subgroups using different radiation techniques was intended. We used hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) to estimate pooled effect sizes. Statistical analysis was performed using the inverse variance heterogeneity model. RESULTS: We identified eleven studies randomizing between PBI and WBI. We did not find significant differences in OS (n = 14,070; HR = 1.02; CI-95%: 0.89-1.16; p = 0.810, and n = 15,203; RD = -0.001; CI-95%: -0.008-0.006; p = 0.785) and BCSS (n = 15,203; RD = 0.001; CI-95%: -0.002-0.005; p = 0.463). PBI also did not result in a significant decrease of NBCD (n = 15,203; RD = -0.003; CI-95%: -0.010-0.003; p = 0.349). A subgroup analysis by radiation technique also did not point to any detectable differences. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a previous assessment of mortality, we could not find a detrimental effect of WBI on OS or NBCD. A longer follow-up might be necessary to fully assess the long-term mortality effects of PBI compared to WBI.

The history and value of face masks.

In the human population, social contacts are a key for transmission of bacteria and viruses. The use of face masks seems to be critical to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 for the period, in which therapeutic interventions are lacking. In this review, we describe the history of masks from the middle age to modern times.

The role of passive immunization in the age of SARS-CoV-2: an update.

The rapid spread of the corona virus pandemic is an existential problem for many people in numerous countries. So far, there is no effective vaccine protection or proven therapy available against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In this review, we describe the role of passive immunization in times of the corona virus. Passive immunization could be a bridging technology to improve the immune defense of critically ill patients until better approaches with effective medications are available.

Long-term quality of life after preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with localized and locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) or radiochemotherapy (PRCT) is used in different tumor sites. The aim of the study was to examine the long-term quality of life (QoL) of localized / locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with PRT/PRCT followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME). METHODS: Assessment of QoL was done using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires for overall QoL and EORTC QLQ-BR23 for breast-specific QoL. The summary scores were categorized into 4 distinct groups to classify the results. Furthermore, a comparative analysis was performed between the study cohort and a previously published reference cohort of healthy adults. We assessed the impact of different clinical, prognostic, and treatment-related factors on selected items from C30 and BR23 using a dependence analysis. RESULTS: Out of 315 patients treated with PRT/PCRT in the years 1991 to 1999, 203 patients were alive at long-term follow-up after a mean of 17.7 years (range 14-21). 37 patients were lost to follow-up and 61 patients refused to be contacted, leading to 105 patients (64 patients after BCS and 41 after ME) being willing to undergo further clinical assessment regarding QoL outcome. Overall, QoL (QLQ-C30) was rated "excellent" or "good" in 85% (mean value) of all patients (BCS 83%, ME 88%). Comparative analysis between the study cohort and a published healthy control group revealed significantly better global health status and physical and role functioning scores in the PRT/PRCT group. The analysis demonstrates no differences in nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, constipation, or financial difficulties. According to the dependence analysis, global QoL was associated with age, operation type and ME reconstruction. CONCLUSION: We did not detect any inferiority of PRT/PRCT compared to a healthy reference group with no hints of a detrimental long-term effect on general and breast-specific quality of life.

Addition of chemotherapy to hyperfractionated radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer-a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adding concurrent chemotherapy (CTx) to definitive radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) improves overall survival. A comparable effect has been reported for hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFX-RT) alone. Adding concurrent CTx to HFX-RT has been investigated in multiple trials, yet an evident effect on oncological outcomes and toxicity profile has not been established to date. Thus, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis on the clinical outcome and toxicity of the addition of CTx to HFX-RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search for randomized controlled trials comparing HFX-RT alone to HFX-RT + concurrent CTx in patients with LA-HNSCC undergoing definite RT. A meta-analysis was performed using the event rates and effect-sizes for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant metastasis-free survival and distant recurrence-free interval (DMFS/DMFI) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) as investigated endpoints. Furthermore, we compared selected acute and late toxicities in the included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using the Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmont, WA, USA) add-in MetaXL 5.3 (EpiGear International, Sunrise Beach, Australia), utilizing the inverse variance heterogeneity model. RESULTS: We identified six studies (n = 1280 patients) randomizing HFX-RT alone and the concurrent addition of CTx. OS was significantly improved in the HFX-RT + CTx group (HR = 0.77, CI95% = 0.66-0.89; p = <0.001). We found similar results in PFS (HR = 0.74, CI95% = 0.63-0.87; p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 0.72, CI95% = 0.60-0.88; p = 0.001). In contrast, acute toxicities (≥grade 3 mucositis, ≥grade 3 dysphagia) and late adverse events including ≥grade 3 xerostomia, ≥grade 3 subcutaneous, ≥grade 3 bone, ≥grade 3 skin toxicity, and ≥grade 3 dysphagia did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of CTx to HFX-RT in the definitive treatment of advanced LA-HNSCC improves OS, CSS, PFS, and LRR without a significant increase in high-grade acute and late toxicities.

Which target volume should be considered when irradiating the regional nodes in breast cancer? Results of a network-meta-analysis.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Radiation treatment to the regional nodes results in an improvement in survival in breast cancer according to a meta-analysis of randomized trials. However, different volumes were targeted in these studies: breast or chestwall only (WBI/CWI), inclusion of the medial supraclavicular region and axillary apex (MS + WBI/CWI) or additional inclusion of the internal mammary chain (IM + MS + WBI/CWI). The benefit of treating the medial supraclavicular region and axillary apex compared to tangential breast or chestwall irradiation only remains unclear. MATERIALS/METHODS: A literature search was conducted identifying trials for adjuvant radiation volumes in nodal irradiation after breast surgery and axillary treatment. Events and effect sizes were extracted from the publications for the endpoints of overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and loco-regional control (LRC). A network meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL V5.3 with the inverse variance heterogeneity model. RESULTS: We found two randomized studies (n = 5836) comparing comprehensive nodal irradiation to sole breast treatment as well as one randomized (n = 1407) and one prospective cohort study (n = 3377) analysing the additional treatment of the internal mammary chain against sole local and supraclavicular and axillary apex radiation. Compared to WBI/CWI alone the treatment of IM + MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.88; CI:0.78-0.99; p = 0.036) results in improved OS unlike MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.99; CI:0.86-1.14; p = 0,89). These results are confirmed in BCSS: IM + MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.82; CI:0.72-0.92; p = 0.002) and MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.96; CI:0.79-1.18; p = 0.69). PFS is significantly improved with the treatment of MS + WBI/CWI (OR = 0.83; CI:0.71-0.97; p = 0.019). Both nodal treatment volumes improve LRC (MS + WBI/CWI OR = 0.74; CI:0.62-0.87; p = 0.004 and IM + MS + WBI/CWI OR = 0.60; CI:0.43-0.86; p < 0,001). Yet only the internal mammary nodes provide a benefit in DMFS (MS + WBI/CWI HR = 0.97; CI:0.81-1.16; p = 0.74 and IM + MS + WBI/CWI HR = 0.84; CI:0.75-0.94; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Expanding the radiation field to the axillary apex and supraclavicular nodes after axillary node dissection reduced loco-regional recurrences without improvement in overall and cancer-specific survival. A prolongation in survival due to regional nodal irradiation is achieved when the internal mammary chain is included. This derives from a reduction in distant metastasis.

Long-term cosmetic outcome after preoperative radio-/chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (PRT/PCRT) represent an increasingly used clinical strategy in different tumor sites. We have previously reported on a PRT/PRCT protocol in patients with locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) with promising clinical results. However, concerns regarding a possible unfavorable influence on cosmesis still exist. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine long-term cosmetic outcome in our series of LABC patients treated with PRT/PCRT followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 315 patients treated with PRT/PCRT in the years 1991 to 1999, 203 were still alive at long-term follow-up of mean 17.7 years (range 14-21). Thirty-seven patients were lost to follow-up and 58 patients refused to be contacted, which resulted in 107 patients (64 patients after BCS and 43 after mastectomy) being available and willing to undergo further cosmetic assessment. One patient had a complete response after PRT/PCRT and refused surgery. PRT/PCRT consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with 50 Gy (5â€¯× 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with a consecutive electron boost or (in case of BCS) a 10-Gy interstitial brachytherapy boost with Ir-192 prior to EBRT. Overall, chemotherapy was administered either prior to RT or concomitantly in the majority of patients. BCS and mastectomy were performed with and without reconstruction. The cosmetic outcome was assessed by patient questionnaire, panel evaluation, and breast retraction assessment (BRA) score. RESULTS: Eighty percent of all BCS patients rated their overall cosmetic result as "excellent" or "good" as compared to 55.8% after mastectomy. Patient and panel ratings on cosmetic outcomes were similar between the two groups. No grade III or IV fibrosis were detected in any of the groups. The median BRA score after breast conserving surgery was 2.9. CONCLUSION: PRT/PCRT is associated with low grades of fibrosis and a good to excellent long-term cosmetic outcome.

Adjuvant radiochemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: As an adjuvant therapeutic strategy in advanced gastric cancer, both adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) and postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCTx) can be considered. Both approaches have been shown to improve overall survival compared to resection alone. Several prospective randomized trials have compared the two postoperative concepts. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify prospective randomized trials which compared adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. As effect sizes, we extracted hazard ratios (HR) as well as event rates from the included trials for the endpoints overall survival, disease-free survival and locoregional control. RESULTS: We identified seven studies that enrolled 1807 patients overall. Combined radiochemotherapy showed no significant improvement of overall survival in comparison to chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.93; 95%CI: 0.82-1.06; p = 0.28). For disease-free survival (HR = 0.86; 95%CI: 0.76-0.98; p = 0.023) and locoregional control (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.42-0.75; p = <0.001) we detected significant advantages from the addition of radiation to chemotherapy. A subgroup analysis demonstrated an improvement in survival when the radiochemotherapy protocol was not de-intensified. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy demonstrate similar oncologic efficacy and therapy-associated toxicity. Individual patient characteristics should therefore determine the therapeutic approach in a multidisciplinary discussion. Irradiation added to standard-dose chemotherapy possibly results in a survival benefit.

Accelerated vs. conventionally fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy in advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) reduces the risk of local-regional failure and most likely increases the survival rate. Patients at high risk for tumor recurrence may benefit from more aggressive altered fractionation schedules in order to reduce the overall time from surgery to completion of radiotherapy. Here, we reviewed the results of six randomized trials addressing the above hypothesis. METHODS: In the six trials of interest, a total of 988 patients with locally advanced HNSCC were randomly assigned to receive either accelerated or conventionally fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy. Hazard ratios (HR) were extracted from available publications for local-regional control, distant metastasis as well as overall-, cancer specific- and disease-free survival. Meta-analysis of the effect sizes was performed using fixed and random effect models. Acute and late side effects were categorized and summarized for comparison. RESULTS: Accelerated radiotherapy did not improve the loco-regional control (n = 988, HR = 0.740, CI = 0.48-1.13, p = 0.162), progression-free survival (HR = 0.89, CI = 0.76-1.04, p = 0.132) or overall survival (HR = 0.88, CI = 0.75-1.04, p = 0.148) significantly. Acute confluent mucositis occurred with significant higher frequency with accelerated radiotherapy. Late side effects did not differ significantly in either group. CONCLUSION: Accelerated radiotherapy does not result in a significant improvement of loco-regional control or overall survival in high-risk patients. Acute but not late radiation toxicity were more frequent with the accelerated RT technique. In clinical practice accelerated postoperative radiation therapy might be a suitable option only for a subset of patients.